I have not been playing much so far in april, but i've won pretty much all my games so far, included the 230 turbos. I've said several times that i won't play the 230, but i can't help my self when im running like jesus. And i'm sure i can beat the game. I'll try to give my self a chance in the 230, but its improtant to move down to the safe 115 game if i catch a bad run.
The 115 turbo is going like a clockwork now, and my stats the last 500 games is pretty equal to plowking and bartchalker class. My last 2000 games is also pretty good and consistently, about 4-5% roi. I'll try to push my last 2000 games 115 turbo stats up to at least 7% roi.
I'm up 1.9K so far in april, hope to make at least 6K.
Later, thomas.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
"However many strong online poker players are reading this blog now, and youre looking ridiculous to all the pros.
First of all,, professionals dont care about ROI, only amatours seems to care about that."
did you just quote yourself? lol...
ROI is a good statistical measure to describe performance in spesific games like the 115 turbo HU game.
Amatours however tend to pay too much attention to the overal ROI and might believe that overall ROI is the best measure on how skilled the player is.
The fact is that the best HU players online tend to only have about 2-6% overall ROI, because they play high stakes and mostly turbo games. Players like adonis, skilled_sox and BCM11 do not have an high ROI, but they got an high average profit/game, and an high hourly profit. Professionals know that total profit, profit/game and hour/profit is way more important than ROI.
Players that play regulars-speed HU at medium and low stakes might have 10-15% ROI. But they are not even in the same universe when it comes to skills and total profit every year compared to the top players.
Hopefully this helped your understanding a bit, matt.
I'm pretty sure he's the one that ripped Thomas in a past post and is quoting Thomas......hater lol
Thomas...even though your reply was very well articulated and accurate, I dont think it will help Matt understand....
your stats for 220 are looking worse than my 110s. You only have small sample, but it is all trending downwards. Does it tell you that you should give it up and face weaker players only at 110s? Just a question.
I have the same issue with 110, but I only table select now. I was probably facing +5% roi usually at 110s.
yeah, agree searching. My 230 graph is prototypical for a losing game.
Its tough to move up in stakes, it took me a long time to move up and crush the 110 sitting first, and it will take a long time before i do the same in the 230.
But the only way to make it is to keep trying. Its simply trial and error for me now.
Post a Comment